:. Flag Submission/Discussion Thread

We can discuss future CN flags and discussion of current flags here.

Less NPO flags would be nice, there are way to many of them.

Iwhould like to have a flag
and chould alliances jsut have ONE flag?
or tow just not alot (I hope you knwo what I mean cuase I don't)

I will second this motion. Each sanctioned alliance needs to agree on one official flag. On the other hand, I'd like to see the invitation to present one official flag extended to sizeable unsanctioned alliances as well.

Yes, the GOONS and LUE flags should probably be in there.

I also agree with the less NPO flags thing. We do not need the NPO flag, the NPO flag with an AK-47, the NPO flag with a penguin, and the NPO flag with an East Germany thingy.

We need a LUE flag to replace the GCUN flag(Long abolished alliance)

Is it at all possible to add the VE flag?

(Posted Image)

Yes, we would love to have that flag. Pwease?

Maroon Allied Guardians is going to be a 250 member alliance once all the alliance affiliations change from the ONOS-TAGA merger. Our official flag at the moment:

(Posted Image)

Large version Here

Yeah, I think that unsanctioned alliances should be able to submit a flag if they have X amount of members, 100 seems to be a fair number because while it isn't huge, it isn't easy to recruit 100 nations to an unsanctioned alliance.

If it sounds fair to the admin team, I'd like to submit one for the Templar Knights, who have about 130 members. :D

(Posted Image)

This post has been edited by Gran the Terrible on Oct 16 2006, 12:01 AM

The Nordreich would love to have one, as we symbolize a Unified German front, something long worked for in the Cyberverse. Would this be possible?

Having our flag would make us feel loved.

I think 150 would be a fair number for unsanctioned alliances. If I read the new sanctioned alliance requirements correctly then there's only going to be 10 at any one time so unsanctioned alliances are only going to get larger.

Well if size is the deciding factor that knocks the GC out. Although since we are the only grey alliance it'd be nice to have our flag added.

I agree with there being to many NPO flags and some of the larger unsanctioned groups definitely deserve flags.

each alliacne should have a flag
only if they have X members are ae X days old
they can have 1000 membersbut if they are just a day old they shouldn't get a flag

and 10 at a time?
when i guess you have to draw a line some where

I would like to submit the following flag.
(Posted Image)

LOSS have been an alliance within CN for 6 months now we have fought in some major wars and are recognised amongst many sanctioned alliances. We have no plans of going into liquidation anytime soon.

Im sure many members within unsanctioned alliances wish to have somthing they can relate to as an image rather than just an alliance affiliation.
----------

I defintely believe that most mid ranged and active alliances should have a flag most our new members ask questions as to when our flag will be added.

I think most active unsanctioned alliances should have their flags added.

E.G.

GOONS
LOSS
VE
NADC
BOSS
TAGA
and more

Do this.

GOONS flag: (Posted Image)
151x80 version: (Posted Image)

This post has been edited by Soviet Canuckistan on Oct 18 2006, 06:15 PM

It's true, there are too many NPO flags. This is a holdover from the days when NPO was 25% of the CN population and should probably be rectified.

indeed. some of them should be deleted and some other flags such as LOSS, GOONS, LUE, etc should take their place.