Title: this place needs a court game
Larry - March 16, 2008 12:48 AM (GMT)
y'know; a prosecutor, an attorney, a defendant, a judge, and some witnesses
whoever leads it would pm the details of what each person knows or thinks to the person and they would go on based on such knowledge.
whoever is guilty would be told that and a rough description of their story, the witnesses would be told what the saw/think they saw, etc. prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney would get a case file and what not.
for srsly
Hyle - March 16, 2008 12:50 AM (GMT)
Larry - March 16, 2008 12:52 AM (GMT)
of course, what everyone says would be entirely there own, just based on what they know about the case. more improv than, for lack of a better term, role playing.
Den Corleone - March 16, 2008 01:10 AM (GMT)
Larry - March 16, 2008 01:48 AM (GMT)
curses, my plot to make someone else do it failed.
But then I can't be edgey the prosecutor.
Alright, I'll get it posted up today or tomorrow.
JGatsby - March 16, 2008 05:00 PM (GMT)
I've been thinking the same thing... I can prove anyone innocent!
Larry - March 16, 2008 07:21 PM (GMT)
Since I might be gone for a while, I'm gonna put making this on hold.
If I'm lucky and my time away is short, then it'll be up today. If not... when I get back.
Hyle - March 16, 2008 08:56 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (JGatsby @ Mar 16 2008, 10:00 AM) |
| I've been thinking the same thing... I can prove anyone innocent! |
I can prove anyone guilty or be a the BA judge.
yoshi71089 - March 17, 2008 07:00 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Larry @ Mar 15 2008, 07:48 PM) |
| whoever is guilty would be told that and a rough description of their story, the witnesses would be told what the saw/think they saw, etc. prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney would get a case file and what not. |
That's assuming they aren't innocent. Whoever does this should decide if the person is actually guilty or innocent. Otherwise the jury has to make a biased decision knowing they are guilty.
I call foreman of the jury... <_< >_>
Hunter-Ghor - March 17, 2008 01:38 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (yoshi71089 @ Mar 17 2008, 03:00 AM) |
| QUOTE (Larry @ Mar 15 2008, 07:48 PM) | | whoever is guilty would be told that and a rough description of their story, the witnesses would be told what the saw/think they saw, etc. prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney would get a case file and what not. |
That's assuming they aren't innocent. Whoever does this should decide if the person is actually guilty or innocent. Otherwise the jury has to make a biased decision knowing they are guilty.
I call foreman of the jury... <_< >_>
|
Assuming the person who is guilty is guilty? I don't think he said anything about "whoever is guilty" necessarily being the defendant.
Larry - March 17, 2008 10:53 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Hunter-Ghor @ Mar 17 2008, 08:38 AM) |
| QUOTE (yoshi71089 @ Mar 17 2008, 03:00 AM) | | QUOTE (Larry @ Mar 15 2008, 07:48 PM) | | whoever is guilty would be told that and a rough description of their story, the witnesses would be told what the saw/think they saw, etc. prosecutor, judge, and defense attorney would get a case file and what not. |
That's assuming they aren't innocent. Whoever does this should decide if the person is actually guilty or innocent. Otherwise the jury has to make a biased decision knowing they are guilty.
I call foreman of the jury... <_< >_>
|
Assuming the person who is guilty is guilty? I don't think he said anything about "whoever is guilty" necessarily being the defendant.
|
Spot on.
This is heavily based on Phoenix Wright, but... with people playing the roles.
JGatsby - March 17, 2008 10:54 PM (GMT)
Sweet... so can I be the Attorney?
John Madigan: Attorney at Law
Hyle - March 17, 2008 11:06 PM (GMT)
Yeah, I wanna be the public defender!