Title: Globalhawk
EARTHQUAKE - June 5, 2007 01:59 PM (GMT)
What do people make of 'Globalhawk', which is the technology that exists to fly hijacked commercial airlines by remote control?
Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on several occasions.
He believes the airliners used in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System.
Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties in Vietnam stated, ‘Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control.’ We know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners by remote control - it’s called ‘Globalhawk.’
We also know that the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the ‘Predator,’ since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security codes… acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it’s a fact that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.
Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on several occasions.
He believes the airliners used in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System.
Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties in Vietnam stated, ‘Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control.’ We know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners by remote control - it’s called ‘Globalhawk.’
We also know that the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the ‘Predator,’ since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security codes… acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it’s a fact that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.
chucksheen - June 5, 2007 05:00 PM (GMT)
SPreston - June 30, 2007 05:06 PM (GMT)
Sure looks like a 16' hole to me. Hmmm. Wings to leave marks on the Pentagon walls, single inline turbofan engine to continue through the 16' hole, shaped-charge warhead to bore the 16' hole through 6 recently steel reinforced walls. I vote for the unmanned Global Hawk Cruise Missile as the winner in the What Mystery Aircraft Hit the Pentagon contest.
EVEN A LITTLE PROPELLER DRIVEN CESSNA WOULD
HAVE A HARD TIME FITTING INTO THAT LITTLE HOLE!!!
http://groups.imeem.com/gyh4dGvb/forums/nJ...mokescreenfire/
EVEN A LITTLE PROPELLER DRIVEN CESSNA WOULD
HAVE A HARD TIME FITTING INTO THAT LITTLE HOLE!!!
http://groups.imeem.com/gyh4dGvb/forums/nJ...mokescreenfire/
alive and still talking - June 30, 2007 05:37 PM (GMT)
good post, this topic belongs in investigate 911
Sureshot - July 13, 2007 01:06 AM (GMT)
Topic moved. ;) Interesting information.