http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/...-of-infamy.html

this guy, Mike Johnston is well known figure in the world of photography.. Had a syndicated weekly article called 'The sunday morning photographer' for quite a few years..

generally a well respected guy in the industry..


I was surprised to see that he believes this stuff....

Scary, isn't it? ;)

What exactly do you refer to by "this stuff," though?

that someone-made-a-decision-to-intentionally-bring-down-WTC7 stuff

Well, so far, all we've been presented with is theories. Yes? No?

I've thought about that too - one possibility is to ensure destruction of the court cases and any evidence in the building or also, to intimidate dissent at home..like the anthrax attacks targeting dems and media - saying "hey, fall in line or we will get you"... i doubt this though.

it could just be that they were sloppy in thinking and really didn't expect much to happen - think about this, did they consider the internet? i mean, how much of WTC7 did you see covered on the media? zilch - it's the internet that spread the word... the internet in any popular, impacting form was not quite proven at the time.. they might not have realized how powerful it would be.

i like to consider these things but it's just the hard facts that are most relevant - variables should be eliminated... Occams razor..

after all, it could be aliens that did this and the mothership laser can only demolish entire buildings at once...? but all we can say is it looks like the building was demolished so we need an independent investigation asap.

...people have always said this gov't (administration, FBI, CIA, etc) was too incompetent to get away with a fake terrorist attack.

My response is usually "yeah, I know. that's why there are so many my g** d*** holes in this official theory." Atleast with the JFK assassination no one truly knows what happened that day, but 9/11? good god, WTC 7 is the result of how sloppy this terrorist attack was. My evidence it was a CD? Just look at the friggen' thing. No magic bullet, no pod, just a building that falls exactly like a CD.

So to the non-believers here, you are kinda right, this gov't IS incompetent...and it shows with all the issues in 9/11.

Yeah we all know it was the raging diesel fuel fires, no wait that didn't hapen. OK then it was after shocks from the Towers 6 and 7 hours earlier. No, no they'll never buy they one. It was structural damage from the free-fall collapse of the Nort Tower. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Man you pathetic bootlickers and your ridiculous theories.

Wow! A photographer with theories about controlled demolition and no facts to back it up!
Fascinating and hard hitting journalism.

I know i`m convinced now!! [thmdwn]

no one is claiming that he is an expert. Its just good to see more high profile people speak out about it and not be such bunch of pussys and afraid of wrecking there reputation or what government could do to them. I dont mean kill them, im talking sponsor deals and etc government has alot power and influnence over ever aspects of corporations, they can send you broke very easy and also very rich $$$ if you show them support. You dont need be engineer or "hard hitting journalism" to know that WTC 7 wasnt brough down by fires, no fire causes building to destroy main support beam exactly so structure implodes on it self and collapse from the bottom floors. You have be complete idiot or very nieve to swollow that shit.