View Full Version: How It Was Done

Loose Change Forum > World Trade Center > How It Was Done


Title: How It Was Done
Description: a short theory


JackD - May 2, 2006 06:17 PM (GMT)
Dozens of books have been written theorizing how the 9/11 attacks might have happened: Griffin, Ahmed, Marrs, Hufschmid, Ruppert, Tarpley...

A common issue for 9/11 Truth skeptics is "I don't believe it. Surely thousands of people had to be involved in the conspiracy"-- but I don't buy that.

Example: an automobile is a conspiracy of motion, but neither the fuel pump nor the manifold needs to know that you are using the car to return a DVD to Blockbuster. The parts just do the job they are told to do. If they don't, they get the sack.

I don't pretend to know how 9/11 was pulled off. This is a guess, borrowed from Tarpley, WoodyBox, and others who have done the trench work -- meant to be concise.

Moles, Patsies, and Teams.
No team knew anything about the other teams, and thus exposure of any one aspect of the scheme would not imperil the rest. In other words, a classic "cell" plan -- in fact, just the organization type that RUMSFELD accuses the ENEMY of using...

THE PLAN
Four or more teams were assembled -- or borrowed from pre-existing operations plans, using both CIA cut-outs and private contractors:

1) THE PATSY SQUAD
Mission: direct, control, manipulate, establish hijacker legend and mass public sitings (see Hopsicker book) via IDs, passports, apartments, flight schools, lessons, gyms, outbreaks of public rage, buying airline tickets, planting evidence, renting cars, getting on video cameras, etc. The patsy team creates intelligence leaks to Russian, German, etc intel services, so that Russian, French, etc intel would in turn send warnings back -- intelligence "laundering", providing all those famous "warnings" to OUR NSA, CIA of an alquada attack (the 'unheeded warnings' hangout) Think Moussaouwi. Dave Frasca. Think Richard Clarke. Think August 6 PDB.

2) THE WAR GAME/ TERROR DRILL TEAM
Mission: write a war game or terror drill script for use on or around 9/11. Involve NORAD, FAA, radar, and paralyze fighter response. Employs a unified, or hidden, or hijacked, command and control. Vigilant Guardian. Amalgam Warrior hidden sub-routine. Onboard aircraft hijack 'drills' by United, American, intersect with live-fly plane swap and drones. Think Operation Northwoods plan. Think Admiral Richard Mies. Myers. Eberhart. Think private contractors like ANZUS and SAIC.

The pre-planned drills involved Trade Center area, Cleveland airport, Johnstown, and Pentagon.
No drill team knew much about the other drills. They were not connected. Curiously, some drills went 'live.' The drill players were taken by surprise.

3) TWIN TOWERS / WTC7 DEMOLITION TEAM
Mission: create shock and awe WTC demolition.
They may have been ongoing for months, or years. The team who rigged the towers likely had no idea the towers would be struck by planes. Maybe they did not even know what materials they were installing. Under the guise of quiet 'asbestos' removal, or placing of 'communication linkages' you could lay a lot of thermite. Fuzes and detonation were probably left til last minute Think CDI. Think Bush/Walker/Kuwaiti Securacom/Stratasec and Giuliani's OEM WTC7 command bunker.

4) MEDIA SPIN AND MOP-UP:
The "cleaners and plumbers" As event broke, quick and hard media spin via planted sources. Rapid response for any foul-ups, both physical teams and media spin. You never know what might go wrong (see: Pennsylvania, Pentagon, WTC7... ) Think Tenet and Clarke's "this has al-quada fingerprints on it" within minutes. Think Bobby Eberle, Gary Bauer, other media shills. If you spin CNN, NYT, etc, fast enough, hard enough, those strange first-hand doubt accounts fade into obscurity. Try to let the CNN media 'discover' the story. Nudge it in right direction. Suppress the 'wrong' story. Ignore, delay, obfuscate, misdirect.

Goal is to get any hard evidence DESTROYED or suppressed ASAP under the pretense of "covering your ass." -- they did the same thing to JFK's car, by the way. They figured that 99.5% of us would fall victim to the spin, and the other 0.5% of us would be too ineffectual to organize or enlighten the others.

You tell me. Did we fall for it? Are we afraid to organize and enlighten the others who did?


How many 'planners' really knew the whole story? Possibly very very few, and only a 'need to know' basis. The rest are just loyal soldiers. No doubt MANY MANY MANY people in the military, at the FAA, NORAD, FDNY etc, have huge doubts about what happened, but consider the cost of coming forward (see Kevin Ryan, Sibel Edmonds) --- versus the reward of keeping yer sweet mouth shut. Please come forward. We need you.

As Webster Tarpley puts it "The September Criminals" are still at large. Do we have the courage to bring truth to bear, and find justice for the 2,800 human beings murdered in cold blood on a September morning?

FM258 - May 2, 2006 07:04 PM (GMT)
Nice job. Its as plausible as anything Ive seen so far....and much more so than what we were told.

[thumbsup]

chucksheen - May 2, 2006 09:12 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 11:17 AM)
Dozens of books have been written theorizing how the 9/11 attacks might have happened.

A common issue for 9/11 Truth skeptics is "surely thousands of people had to be involved in the conspiracy"-- but I don't buy that.

An automobile is a conspiracy of motion, but neither the fuel pump nor the manifold needs to know that you are using the car to return a DVD to Blockbuster. The parts just do the job they are told to do. If they don't, they get the sack.

I don't pretend to know how 9/11 was pulled off. But here's my best guess, borrowed from Tarpley, WoodyBox, and others who have done the trench work

Moles, Patsies, and Teams.
No team knew much, if anything, about the other teams, and thus exposure of any one aspect of the scheme would not imperil the rest.

In other words, a classic "cell" plan -- in fact, just the organization that RUMSFELD accuses the ENEMY of doing...

THE PLAN
Four or more teams were assembled or borrowed from pre-existing operations plans:

1) THE PATSY SQUAD
Mission: direct, control, manipulate, establish hijacker legend and mass public sitings (see Hopsicker book) via IDs, passports, apartments, flight schools, lessons, gyms, outbreaks of public rage, getting on video cameras, etc. The patsy team creates intelligence leaks to Russian, German, etc intel services, so that Russian, French, etc intel would in turn send warnings back -- intelligence "laundering", providing all those famous "warnings" to OUR NSA, CIA of an alquada attack (the 'unheeded warnings' hangout) Think Dave Frasca. Think Richard Clarke. Think August 6 PDB.

2) THE WAR GAME/ TERROR DRILL TEAM
Mission: write a war game or terror drill script for use on or around 9/11. Involve NORAD, FAA, radar, and paralyze fighter response. Employs a unified, or hidden, or hijacked, command and control. Think Admiral Richard Mies. Think private contractors like ANZUS and SAIC.

The pre-planned drills involved Trade Center area, Cleveland airport, Johnstown, and Pentagon.
No drill team knew much about the other drills. Curiously, some drills went 'live.'

3) TWIN TOWERS / WTC7 DEMOLITION TEAM
Mission: create shock and awe tower demolition.
They may have been ongoing for months, or years. The team who rigged the towers likely had no idea the towers would be struck by planes. Maybe they did not even know what materials they were installing. Under the guise of quiet 'asbestos' removal, or placing of 'communication linkages' you could lay a lot of thermite. Fuzes and detonation were probably left til last minute Think Securacom/Stratasec and Giuliani's OEM WTC7 command bunker.

4) Media spin and mop-up team: quick and hard media spin via planted sources. Rapid response for any foul-ups, both physical teams and media spin. You never know what might go wrong (see: Pennsylvania, Pentagon, WTC7... ) Think Bobby Eberle, Gary Bauer, other shills. If you spin CNN, NYT, etc, fast enough, hard enough, those strange first-hand doubt accounts fade into obscurity. You get the evidence DESTROYED or suppressed ASAP under the pretense of "covering your ass." -- they did the same thing to JFK's car, by the way. They figured that 99.5% of us would fall victim to the spin, and the other 0.5% of us would be too ineffectual to organize or enlighten the others.

You tell me.


How many people really knew the whole story? Possibly very very very few, and only a 'need to know' basis. The rest are just loyal soldiers. No doubt MANY MANY MANY people in the military, at the FAA, NORAD, FDNY etc, have huge doubts about what happened, but consider the cost of coming forward (see Kevin Ryan, Sibel Edmonds) --- versus the reward of keeping yer sweet mouth shut.

WOW, nice job. Seems highly plausible to me. We need some more whistleblowers.

JackD - May 2, 2006 09:15 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (FM258 @ May 2 2006, 07:04 PM)
Nice job. Its as plausible as anything Ive seen so far....and much more so than what we were told.

[thumbsup]

Thanks. I wanted to try to boil down the 1000's of pages I have read to a few concise and realistic points.

One issue that mainstream folks have is that the official story gives mental 'closure' to the events.
Take away their Official Story, and they howl. They lose that closure.

it's nice to have a short and sweet POSSIBLE scenario to thrust under their noses (along with a free DVD of loosechange...)

Feel free to critique, beg, borrow, steal, improve. I'm a beginner, anyway.

FM258 - May 2, 2006 09:26 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 05:15 PM)


One issue that mainstream folks have is that the official story gives mental 'closure' to the events.
Take away their Official Story, and they howl. They lose that closure.

Another great point that I may adopt in the future. I live in NY, lost 4 of my buddies at WTC...there was NEVER any closure for me, Ive been sick about it since 9/11/01.

But there are other people who haven't been hurt so badly. I'm sure they were extremely upset by that days events, yet have since accepted it and have moved on....its these people who will NOT WANT TO REVISIT 9/11, because its an old wound thats best kept closed.

I won't have closure until THE TRUE murderers are brought to justice.


JackD - May 2, 2006 09:40 PM (GMT)
just found this by chance -- a nice little eye-morsel!


http://911u.org/CoDR/DR215.html

9/11 University: the False-Flag Legend of 9/11, Deconstructed.

Sorry, text can't be posted. If someone can paste the whole image in....


Zor - May 2, 2006 10:16 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 02:17 PM)

Example: an automobile is a conspiracy of motion, but neither the fuel pump nor the manifold needs to know that you are using the car to return a DVD to Blockbuster. The parts just do the job they are told to do. If they don't, they get the sack.

Great example! [thumbsup]

chucksheen - May 2, 2006 10:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 02:40 PM)
just found this by chance -- a nice little eye-morsel!


http://911u.org/CoDR/DR215.html

9/11 University: the False-Flag Legend of 9/11, Deconstructed.

Sorry, text can't be posted. If someone can paste the whole image in....

Brilliant page! I love the creativity! This will be a big help for sure IMO.

JackD - May 3, 2006 07:51 PM (GMT)
I got a phone call from the mossad today. They said I got the story part right, and part wrong, but thanks for trying.

They're going send me a year's supply of Turtle Wax. [crylol]

sg1 - May 3, 2006 09:16 PM (GMT)
Good post! Very plausible.

JackD - May 17, 2006 06:35 PM (GMT)
Mostly, if you follow the money, and look to see who benefited, either financially or politically, you are led back to the same suspects.

Note to newbies: yes, it wasn't GW Bush II.

HallowsEve - May 17, 2006 10:04 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 17 2006, 06:35 PM)
Mostly, if you follow the money, and look to see who benefited, either financially or politically, you are led back to the same suspects.

Note to newbies: yes, it wasn't GW Bush II.

I was just posting this exact comment a couple days ago (another website) about Bush and not being directly behind it. I told them I doubt Bush even has the capability to count to ten, however don't let that lull them into a false sense of security (about his lack of involvement). The real killers are still at large and I sure didn't mean Osama and company. Bush was just a puppet doing the bidding of his handlers to help cover up the events of that day. Obviously he has made financial gain from all of this along the way. I suppose that was just extra icing on the cake for the SOB.

I enjoyed your writings on the events of 9/11. I'm reading Webster Tarpley now and was glad you referenced his info too. It's a very good book.

hdog - May 18, 2006 02:09 AM (GMT)
I really like the part about leaking the story to foreign intel agencies.

JackD - May 19, 2006 03:48 AM (GMT)
The 'warnings' hang-out was clearly planned long in advance. It smells like one of Karl Rove's schemes. Think of dozens of intelligence operatives, thinking they are really onto something, but really they had only penetrated the faked back-story of american sleeper cells --- call al-quada merely "CIA red team" or Rumsfelds P20G. (proactive preventative operations group) -- the anti-terror group that was supposed to infiltrate and 'provoke' terror groups into action....

The public, I am afraid, falls for the whole 'missed warnings' story hook, line, and sinker. The outrage and fear over 9/11 makes us latch onto any 'incompetence' theories -- and underneath that lid, presto, al-quada. "We were warned..." blah blah. Thus we can direct our rage against the Bush administration that they 'failed us.' No one sold the whole "we failed you" apology better than Richard Clarke. Sheesh, he got a book out of it, money, and a Daily Show appearance... looks like a hero, but he's in fact pulling your marinet strings.

I will repeat what others have said -- 9/11 was not a massive intelligence failure -- 9/11 was a massive intelligence SUCCESS.



JackD - May 26, 2006 01:25 AM (GMT)
Who has read Webster Tarpley's books? Curious.

Method - May 30, 2006 06:01 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 02:17 PM)

1) THE PATSY SQUAD
Mission: direct, control, manipulate, establish hijacker legend and mass public sitings (see Hopsicker book) via IDs, passports, apartments, flight schools, lessons, gyms, outbreaks of public rage, buying airline tickets, planting evidence, renting cars, getting on video cameras, etc. The patsy team creates intelligence leaks to Russian, German, etc intel services, so that Russian, French, etc intel would in turn send warnings back -- intelligence "laundering", providing all those famous "warnings" to OUR NSA, CIA of an alquada attack (the 'unheeded warnings' hangout) Think Moussaouwi. Dave Frasca. Think Richard Clarke. Think August 6 PDB.

Although it doesn't relate directly to this, for some reason I always think back to the "Zimmerman Telegram".

For those of you who don't know what the Zimmerman Telegram, here is the lowdown....

(Decoded message text of the Zimmermann Telegram)

FROM 2nd from London # 5747.
"We intend to begin on the first of February unrestricted submarine warfare. We shall endeavor in spite of this to keep the United States of America neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal or alliance on the following basis: make war together, make peace together, generous financial support and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement in detail is left to you. You will inform the President of the above most secretly as soon as the outbreak of war with the United States of America is certain and add the suggestion that he should, on his own initiative, invite Japan to immediate adherence and at the same time mediate between Japan and ourselves. Please call the President's attention to the fact that the ruthless employment of our submarines now offers the prospect of compelling England in a few months to make peace." Signed, ZIMMERMANN.


Makes me think of "planting bogus evidence and/or claims" for personal gains.




Steve [salute]

HallowsEve - May 31, 2006 03:19 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 26 2006, 01:25 AM)
Who has read Webster Tarpley's books? Curious.

I have been reading it....yet to finish it. I've been pretty busy as of late but am looking forward to the rest of it. I'm about 145 pages into it. I know there are a few others on the board that have read it as well.

JerryB9105 - May 31, 2006 01:52 PM (GMT)
This is just a little something, something that has been lingering in my brain regarding the two airplanes that crashed into the WTC complex on 9/11 --

I can't help but keep the two things separate -- the airplane crashing, and the buildings unexpectedly falling down.

Common knowledge that no airplane had ever brought down a building before (yet they 'appeared' to be the cause to the horrified onlooker, especially with the help of the news media and certain others feeding that conclusion) -- the fact remains that none had ever done so in the past. Knowing that -- then what would have made the buildings the likely targets in the first place? Any terrortist would surely have also been surpised like everyone else -- not expecting an intended purpose as total devestation. This was without a doubt a staged act to get the American people all stirred up and ready to do battle. The simple facts of NOT knowing what the results would be or for no one expecting what would happen -- to happen.

I'm not sure I made that last point clear, but since no event had ever produced such terrible disaster any time in the past, then what would have made the alleged foreign terrorist think that their actions would be any different, that their suicidal actions would result in any shape or form into the disaster that resulted? Point is -- it doesn't make sense to think it would. This fact alone seems to be lost in the confusion of all we saw and all we have since learned about the attack.

It sure brings into question, in my own mind it does, as to what the intent of any alledged terrorist might have otherwise been trying to accomplish. Not to belabor this but if they were for real they sure wouldn't have expected the resulting devestation -- unless -- there again -- unless someone with knowledge far and beyond what a simple airplane crash into a building would do, i.e., knowledge of how to go about bringing buildings (and all inside) crashing downwards. A smaller matter (the airplane crash) made far worse, turned into far worse (by comparrison) but made knowingly possible by means of controlled demolition -- That my friend is something we ALL have prior understanding of (we've seen entire buildings and other structures brought to the ground exactly like what happened on that day); it doesn't say much for an attack (and all that supposedly went into planning it) if all that was intended was crashing a couple of planes into a couple of high-rise buildings, no matter where those buildings might be located.

Blowing the darn things up-- and all the preparations that go into that act -- NOW that's entirely another matter; something far more dramatic for a televised audience to witness. One that lends itself to further investigation. Without question -- A slight of hand to fool the onlooker into thinking he/she sees what the real terrorist intends for us to see. A trick, a terrible trick without concern for life or property or consequence. So do it, please -- investigate. And then do something about it -- let the chips fall where they may. Comments from a concerned citizen.

www.truth911.net - May 31, 2006 09:22 PM (GMT)
my new site is up... contains all the 9/11 info you need

WWW.TRUTH911.NET

JackD - June 1, 2006 06:35 PM (GMT)
Thanks! I suggest you start a new thread entitled

"I'm promoting my new site!" in allcaps-- it would clear up the confusion engendered by your soft-sell approach......



:)

JackD - June 4, 2006 08:18 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 06:17 PM)
Dozens of books have been written theorizing how the 9/11 attacks might have happened: Griffin, Ahmed, Marrs, Hufschmid, Ruppert, Tarpley...

A common issue for 9/11 Truth skeptics is "I don't believe it. Surely thousands of people had to be involved in the conspiracy"-- but I don't buy that.

Example: an automobile is a conspiracy of motion, but neither the fuel pump nor the manifold needs to know that you are using the car to return a DVD to Blockbuster. The parts just do the job they are told to do. If they don't, they get the sack.

I don't pretend to know how 9/11 was pulled off. This is a guess, borrowed from Tarpley, WoodyBox, and others who have done the trench work -- meant to be concise.

Moles, Patsies, and Teams.
No team knew anything about the other teams, and thus exposure of any one aspect of the scheme would not imperil the rest. In other words, a classic "cell" plan -- in fact, just the organization type that RUMSFELD accuses the ENEMY of using...

THE PLAN
Four or more teams were assembled -- or borrowed from pre-existing operations plans, using both CIA cut-outs and private contractors:

1) THE PATSY SQUAD
Mission: direct, control, manipulate, establish hijacker legend and mass public sitings (see Hopsicker book) via IDs, passports, apartments, flight schools, lessons, gyms, outbreaks of public rage, buying airline tickets, planting evidence, renting cars, getting on video cameras, etc. The patsy team creates intelligence leaks to Russian, German, etc intel services, so that Russian, French, etc intel would in turn send warnings back -- intelligence "laundering", providing all those famous "warnings" to OUR NSA, CIA of an alquada attack (the 'unheeded warnings' hangout) Think Moussaouwi. Dave Frasca. Think Richard Clarke. Think August 6 PDB.

2) THE WAR GAME/ TERROR DRILL TEAM
Mission: write a war game or terror drill script for use on or around 9/11. Involve NORAD, FAA, radar, and paralyze fighter response. Employs a unified, or hidden, or hijacked, command and control. Vigilant Guardian. Amalgam Warrior hidden sub-routine. Onboard aircraft hijack 'drills' by United, American, intersect with live-fly plane swap and drones. Think Operation Northwoods plan. Think Admiral Richard Mies. Myers. Eberhart. Think private contractors like ANZUS and SAIC.

The pre-planned drills involved Trade Center area, Cleveland airport, Johnstown, and Pentagon.
No drill team knew much about the other drills. They were not connected. Curiously, some drills went 'live.' The drill players were taken by surprise.

3) TWIN TOWERS / WTC7 DEMOLITION TEAM
Mission: create shock and awe WTC demolition.
They may have been ongoing for months, or years. The team who rigged the towers likely had no idea the towers would be struck by planes. Maybe they did not even know what materials they were installing. Under the guise of quiet 'asbestos' removal, or placing of 'communication linkages' you could lay a lot of thermite. Fuzes and detonation were probably left til last minute Think CDI. Think Bush/Walker/Kuwaiti Securacom/Stratasec and Giuliani's OEM WTC7 command bunker.

4) MEDIA SPIN AND MOP-UP:
The "cleaners and plumbers" As event broke, quick and hard media spin via planted sources. Rapid response for any foul-ups, both physical teams and media spin. You never know what might go wrong (see: Pennsylvania, Pentagon, WTC7... ) Think Tenet and Clarke's "this has al-quada fingerprints on it" within minutes. Think Bobby Eberle, Gary Bauer, other media shills. If you spin CNN, NYT, etc, fast enough, hard enough, those strange first-hand doubt accounts fade into obscurity. Try to let the CNN media 'discover' the story. Nudge it in right direction. Suppress the 'wrong' story. Ignore, delay, obfuscate, misdirect.

Goal is to get any hard evidence DESTROYED or suppressed ASAP under the pretense of "covering your ass." -- they did the same thing to JFK's car, by the way. They figured that 99.5% of us would fall victim to the spin, and the other 0.5% of us would be too ineffectual to organize or enlighten the others.

You tell me. Did we fall for it? Are we afraid to organize and enlighten the others who did?


How many 'planners' really knew the whole story? Possibly very very few, and only a 'need to know' basis. The rest are just loyal soldiers. No doubt MANY MANY MANY people in the military, at the FAA, NORAD, FDNY etc, have huge doubts about what happened, but consider the cost of coming forward (see Kevin Ryan, Sibel Edmonds) --- versus the reward of keeping yer sweet mouth shut. Please come forward. We need you.

As Webster Tarpley puts it "The September Criminals" are still at large. Do we have the courage to bring truth to bear, and find justice for the 2,800 human beings murdered in cold blood on a September morning?

[whistle] '


wow. i woulda thunk that a off-the-top of my head theory with NO evidence would abeen thoroughly debunked by now.

with e'ry debunk, mind you, a case of American Frozen Corndogs. F--- You frenchies, UK types, we make da corndogs .....


Apparenly no one has the cojones....


Condi.... Kean... Zelikow.. Hamilton.... just give me a debunk of ONE of the four points... and i'lll send you the corndogs FEdex... .. 9/11 CR fans... if you can do it... send me your address... i'll be $20 poorer to see your debunk.

If no one can debunk my pathetic it-took-me-5-minutes-to write theory, well, that makes the 9/11 CR look jus a lil bit PATH$ETIC......

knockerselfout



[thumbsup]
Jack D, Yolam


JackD - June 7, 2006 06:43 AM (GMT)
Now i feel kind of bad. My theory has put the trolls off their supper.

Anyone got a good debunk? I'd really like to get some criticism, and tighten it up for publication.

JackD - June 19, 2006 10:17 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 2 2006, 06:17 PM)
Dozens of books have been written theorizing how the 9/11 attacks might have happened: Griffin, Ahmed, Marrs, Hufschmid, Ruppert, Tarpley...

A common issue for 9/11 Truth skeptics is "I don't believe it. Surely thousands of people had to be involved in the conspiracy"-- but I don't buy that.

Example: an automobile is a conspiracy of motion, but neither the fuel pump nor the manifold needs to know that you are using the car to return a DVD to Blockbuster. The parts just do the job they are told to do. If they don't, they get the sack.

I don't pretend to know how 9/11 was pulled off. This is a guess, borrowed from Tarpley, WoodyBox, and others who have done the trench work -- meant to be concise.

Moles, Patsies, and Teams.
No team knew anything about the other teams, and thus exposure of any one aspect of the scheme would not imperil the rest. In other words, a classic "cell" plan -- in fact, just the organization type that RUMSFELD accuses the ENEMY of using...

THE PLAN
Four or more teams were assembled -- or borrowed from pre-existing operations plans, using both CIA cut-outs and private contractors:

1) THE PATSY SQUAD
Mission: direct, control, manipulate, establish hijacker legend and mass public sitings (see Hopsicker book) via IDs, passports, apartments, flight schools, lessons, gyms, outbreaks of public rage, buying airline tickets, planting evidence, renting cars, getting on video cameras, etc. The patsy team creates intelligence leaks to Russian, German, etc intel services, so that Russian, French, etc intel would in turn send warnings back -- intelligence "laundering", providing all those famous "warnings" to OUR NSA, CIA of an alquada attack (the 'unheeded warnings' hangout) Think Moussaouwi. Dave Frasca. Think Richard Clarke. Think August 6 PDB.

2) THE WAR GAME/ TERROR DRILL TEAM
Mission: write a war game or terror drill script for use on or around 9/11. Involve NORAD, FAA, radar, and paralyze fighter response. Employs a unified, or hidden, or hijacked, command and control. Vigilant Guardian. Amalgam Warrior hidden sub-routine. Onboard aircraft hijack 'drills' by United, American, intersect with live-fly plane swap and drones. Think Operation Northwoods plan. Think Admiral Richard Mies. Myers. Eberhart. Think private contractors like ANZUS and SAIC.

The pre-planned drills involved Trade Center area, Cleveland airport, Johnstown, and Pentagon.
No drill team knew much about the other drills. They were not connected. Curiously, some drills went 'live.' The drill players were taken by surprise.

3) TWIN TOWERS / WTC7 DEMOLITION TEAM
Mission: create shock and awe WTC demolition.
They may have been ongoing for months, or years. The team who rigged the towers likely had no idea the towers would be struck by planes. Maybe they did not even know what materials they were installing. Under the guise of quiet 'asbestos' removal, or placing of 'communication linkages' you could lay a lot of thermite. Fuzes and detonation were probably left til last minute Think CDI. Think Bush/Walker/Kuwaiti Securacom/Stratasec and Giuliani's OEM WTC7 command bunker.

4) MEDIA SPIN AND MOP-UP:
The "cleaners and plumbers" As event broke, quick and hard media spin via planted sources. Rapid response for any foul-ups, both physical teams and media spin. You never know what might go wrong (see: Pennsylvania, Pentagon, WTC7... ) Think Tenet and Clarke's "this has al-quada fingerprints on it" within minutes. Think Bobby Eberle, Gary Bauer, other media shills. If you spin CNN, NYT, etc, fast enough, hard enough, those strange first-hand doubt accounts fade into obscurity. Try to let the CNN media 'discover' the story. Nudge it in right direction. Suppress the 'wrong' story. Ignore, delay, obfuscate, misdirect.

Goal is to get any hard evidence DESTROYED or suppressed ASAP under the pretense of "covering your ass." -- they did the same thing to JFK's car, by the way. They figured that 99.5% of us would fall victim to the spin, and the other 0.5% of us would be too ineffectual to organize or enlighten the others.

You tell me. Did we fall for it? Are we afraid to organize and enlighten the others who did?


How many 'planners' really knew the whole story? Possibly very very few, and only a 'need to know' basis. The rest are just loyal soldiers. No doubt MANY MANY MANY people in the military, at the FAA, NORAD, FDNY etc, have huge doubts about what happened, but consider the cost of coming forward (see Kevin Ryan, Sibel Edmonds) --- versus the reward of keeping yer sweet mouth shut. Please come forward. We need you.

As Webster Tarpley puts it "The September Criminals" are still at large. Do we have the courage to bring truth to bear, and find justice for the 2,800 human beings murdered in cold blood on a September morning?

one question is, WHO WROTE THE TERROR SCRIPTS?

second

What was the Omaha /OFFUT AFB meeting about?

izzy - June 21, 2006 01:53 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (hdog @ May 18 2006, 02:09 AM)
I really like the part about leaking the story to foreign intel agencies.

That soes make sense.

izzy

I need to know where the passengers are in this---and what hit the towers? Missiles? airliners, mil. aircraft?

JackD - June 21, 2006 04:23 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (izzy @ Jun 21 2006, 01:53 AM)

I need to know where the passengers are in this---and what hit the towers? Missiles? airliners, mil. aircraft?

9/11 was a horrible magic trick.

we were given an assortment of images, themes, etc -- planes passengers hijackers phone calls box cutters -- and then the news 'put the story together' for us.

the passenger issue is fascinating. check out killtown's passenger biography, or go to team8plus.org -- sorry no links --

I think you may discover that there were not 4 missing flights that day. maybe only 3. maybe even 2.

the fashionable debate of today is 'converted remote control 767 tanker hit WTC2' vs 'CGI imagery plus preplanted charges, and maybe throw in an uncoventional missile' hit the towers.

either way: somebody murdered 2,800 human beings, including 343 new york fireman, i am mad as hell, and want justice.

[salute]

izzy - June 21, 2006 06:04 AM (GMT)
The count now of how many laws Bush has broken is 750.

And that's not even counting 9/11. ....and the only "job" he's ever held was hit man for his daddy prior to 1988. That means he was an insider to his fathers plans and decisions. 1989, they added Boxcutters" to THE BIG PLAN....NOT TOO MANY INDICATORS (i.e. SS made no move on him in the schoolhouse is just one) he was very aware of the plans for a long time.


izzy

JackD - June 29, 2006 05:41 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ Jun 21 2006, 04:23 AM)

9/11 was a horrible magic trick.

we were given an assortment of images, themes, etc -- a dizzying array of CNN fear stories, planes , passengers hijackers , phone calls , box cutters -- and then the news 'put the story together' for us.

the passenger issue is fascinating. check out killtown's passenger biography, or go to team8plus.org -- sorry no links -- you MUST look into WHO THE PASSENGERS WERE>

it is a rosetta stone, of sorts.

I think you may discover that there were not 4 missing flights that day. maybe only 3. maybe even 2.

the fashionable debate of today is 'converted remote control 767 tanker hit WTC2' vs 'CGI imagery plus preplanted charges, and maybe throw in an uncoventional missile' hit the towers.

either way: somebody murdered 2,800 human beings, including 343 new york fireman, i am mad as hell, and want justice.

[salute]

Perhaps a nice spotty troll will post to my thread.

as of yet, none do. I cant BUY a shill today... :(

8bitagent - June 29, 2006 10:29 PM (GMT)
Mossad front company in the WTC allowed Mossad who were already here to plant the sublevel bombs, thermate cutters, and some unknown devices. The planes were remote controlled to hit at the right spot. The 5 dancing "Arabs" is another giveaway.

This is my theory at least. Anyone agree?

JackD - June 30, 2006 06:08 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (8bitagent @ Jun 29 2006, 10:29 PM)
Mossad front company in the WTC allowed Mossad who were already here to plant the sublevel bombs, thermate cutters, and some unknown devices. The planes were remote controlled to hit at the right spot. The 5 dancing "Arabs" is another giveaway.

This is my theory at least. Anyone agree?
QUOTE


The largest penalty levied among the 59 public cases was $250,000 against Zim American Israeli Shipping Co. of Norfolk, Va., for trade with Cuba. Zim, which is about half owned by the Israeli government, is one of the largest shipping companies in the world.

Nobody at the Norfolk office of Zim knew anything concrete about the penalty. "I think it happened a long time ago," said one official.

But they do know about terrorism. The company relocated from the 16th floor of the World Trade Center just a week before the Sept. 11 attack, sparking speculation in the conspiracy press that the Israeli Mossad had tipped off the company ahead of time.


---

I think you're on to something.

Perhaps Zim Corp wasn't "tipped off" by the Mossad.

Perhaps it's better stated that Zim was merely a Mossad-related front.

where better to organize a building demo -- than from inside the WTC itself?

food for thought

JackD - June 30, 2006 06:20 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (8bitagent @ Jun 29 2006, 10:29 PM)
The 5 dancing "Arabs" is another giveaway.

The dancing israelis was another funhouse of mirrors effect.

you THINK it's a smoking gun. but then you realize

the israelis were TRYING to get noticed. (that's not very Mossad-esque)

they were carrying BOXCUTTERS (which re-emphasizes some sort of hijacker/boxcutter meme)

what does it add up to? misdirection. a blatant attempt to put bogus attention on israeli spies, which adds up to nothing substantial, and is therefore s--t-canned.

if you found mossad agents with gold bricks, or blueprints, or thermite, well, i'll change my tune.

but 5 guys doing a hava naghila on top of a van that says MOSSAD MOVING SYSTEMS and high-fiving -- that's just straight out of Joe Viall's diary!

:lol:

8bitagent - July 1, 2006 06:32 AM (GMT)
Well you look at Mossad capturing the attacks on camera
Trying to plant bombs on the george washington bridge
Zim and Urban moving systems front companies...both "Mover" companies
Mossad confirmed living near the hijackers
Big Israeli spy ring in and around 9/11 timeframe
The Arab looking guys in a van trying to get an interview with bush on 9/11
Sharon not showing up in new york, and telling bush 9/11 was a good thing

Here's a big list of mainstream news items:
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthrea...ighlight=Israel

broodlinger - July 7, 2006 07:58 PM (GMT)
>Anyone got a good debunk? I'd really like to get some criticism, and tighten it up for publication.

It's a good theory, jdyolam. The problem is that sometimes when you're right, people read it, and go "yep".

I'd like to see us start putting together a book of what we know, so we don't have to keep repeating ourselves. Killtown does a good job of collecting evidence on his blog, and I'm going to start doing that myself.


911wasaninsidejob - July 7, 2006 08:06 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (jdyolam @ May 26 2006, 01:25 AM)
Who has read Webster Tarpley's books? Curious.

Im in the middle of it right now...that shit is the Mihop encycolpedia lol

izzy - July 8, 2006 12:24 AM (GMT)
Working on a scenario every now and then is an excellent exercise to hone one's thinking ability--everyone should try it at least once, and actually commit to paper a plan. It's a murder mystery like none other, isn't it?

For instance, we have a BUNDLE of objectives, not just one, which would make it a lot easier. It may be that the gold heist was the leading objective, Remember, Rummy had admitted a 2.3 TRILLION unaccounted for less than 24 hours before, and was never addressed because 9/11 took over all else. But the amount of gold taken was huge, and I don't remember an amount given recovered. And then there was silence! No accounting, nothing. I think it is safe to say that the gold will not be returned to it's original owners. It could turn out that the towers were chosen MOSTLY for their proximity to the gold, rather than it's symbolism, asbestos cleanup costs, but for it's dramatic distraction as a gold heist was going on. The absence of articles on this is like the dog that didn't bark.

[also, I've read Tarpley's books--excellent--and useful as a reference for geo-political substance--his forte--his treatment of the 10-20 years prior to 9/11 was fascinating.--clearly 9/11 has been on the drawing board a long time. and I think anyone planning on living in and understanding this world the next ten years, needs to know enough to know when the media is flat out lying about the motives of other countries....pure hogwash.]





Hosted for free by zIFBoards