Title: Wmd's
Description: A question.
JAStewart - July 27, 2006 01:39 PM (GMT)
If the government was so smart to orchrestrate 9/11, why couldn't they just have """""found""""" some WMD's in Iraq?
MJChicago - July 27, 2006 01:55 PM (GMT)
why go through the hassle of planting WMD's when you've already convinced the American People that he has them?
And once your troops are already there... it dosent matter.
JAStewart - July 27, 2006 01:57 PM (GMT)
I guess you're right.
When they said that he didn't have, no-one really seemed to give a shit
MJChicago - July 27, 2006 02:03 PM (GMT)
Yeah your right. Once they said they didnt find any WMD's there was a lot of confusing, then the dipshit parachutes onto an Aircraft Carrier and its ok. :lol:
THE DECIDER - July 27, 2006 06:08 PM (GMT)
(1) illegal weapons programs
(2) sanitization of ammunition depots
(3) chemical munitions storages
(4) stockpile of chemical & biological weapons
(5) al-musayyib rocket test facility
(6) mobile production facilities for bioligical agents
(7) undeclared chemical warheads
(8) 26k liters of anthrax
(9) bocholism
(10) 1.5 tons of V.X
(11) saran nerve gas
(12) warheads hidden in palmtrees
(13) robust nucular programs
(14) aluminuim tubes
(15) bio trucks
(16) uranuim from africa (wich was later false)
what a joke!
MaryJane69 - August 20, 2006 05:30 PM (GMT)
I've thought of this too. If they told a number of lies, why not just say they had found the weapons?
I think it would have been too tricky to get them in, and stage finding them. The whole world is watching the states now. It would have been silly to take that risk, when everyone just bought that 'hey, they MUST be the bad guys! They have WMDs" line.