Title: Some Suggestions
Description: If LC is to be improved
whywhathow - July 28, 2006 05:36 AM (GMT)
This web address takes you to several critiques of Loose Change which will give you very specific errors made in the film.
You must be accurate to have any effect, otherwaise you pander to those who you nominally wish to expose.
http://www.oilempire.us/loose-change.html
chucksheen - July 28, 2006 06:03 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (whywhathow @ Jul 27 2006, 10:36 PM) |
This web address takes you to several critiques of Loose Change which will give you very specific errors made in the film. You must be accurate to have any effect, otherwaise you pander to those who you nominally wish to expose. http://www.oilempire.us/loose-change.html |
Thanks, we know. This is old news that circulates pretty often. We welcome criticism but we are in search of new criticism. The new film will be without a single hitch since there is so much overwhelming material. The mistakes were honest and are often mistaken for blatent misleading because 9/11 is emotionally charged to begin with. People get too personal instead of remaining strictly factual.
whywhathow - July 28, 2006 06:36 AM (GMT)
I look forward to the next release! :rolleyes:
Prove me wrong!
Make the next Loose Change totally factual and you will be doing this country a great service!
I am sorry I came to this Forum with attitude, thanks for your tolerance.
Suggestion: Focus more on PNAC and their "report" Rebuilding America's Defences, which blatantly calls for the United States to impose a Pax Americana on the world! That is a document that requires no proof to show it exists. If more United States citizens were aware of PNAC and read that crazy "report" and also saw who signed the Statement of Principles, they'd be outraged, I would hope. Does the majority of US Citizens want us to be a world-wide imperial force? Wouldn;t that mean everyone except the most priviledged would have to pull a couple tours of duty just to do what PNAC describes? They want a HUGE U.S. military. Spending ten minutes of the film on PNAC would wake everyone up, I think. Fire on the mountain. God Bless Ye and I hope you succeed in alerting the masses to the unanswered questions surrounding 911.
Me? I'm trine to alert my pals and extended circle to PNAC and work for paper ballots and continued access to the internet, since this is where we can rally and challenge those Govt officials who are as beligerant, lawless, and arrogant as this strange creature George Bush II, his Royal Highness with the signing statements and the single veto. Hargh. Someone tell me it's a bad dream. [cheers]
broodlinger - August 18, 2006 10:08 AM (GMT)
>If more United States citizens were aware of PNAC and read that crazy "report" and also saw who signed the Statement of Principles, they'd be outraged, I would hope.
PNAC is 40% Jewish, as per my research, including notable Zionists. It's not hard to see where this is going. Jews make up 0.25% of the world's population. I don't put tremendous faith in anti-semitic thinking, but nevertheless, it's useful to know where these topics are focused.
0.25% of the world's population commands a lot of our attention. A lot more than the 6m Poles who were killed in the Holocaust.
whywhathow - August 21, 2006 04:14 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| PNAC is 40% Jewish, as per my research, including notable Zionists. It's not hard to see where this is going. Jews make up 0.25% of the world's population. I don't put tremendous faith in anti-semitic thinking, but nevertheless, it's useful to know where these topics are focused. |
I have no idea where you got this info or if it is credible.
One thing that I am not, and am assuming you are not either is anti-semitic. As far as I'm concerned the Zionist Protocols area frame-up which is just another example of all the times people have tried to pin some myth on Jews to make an excuse for a pogrom or final solution, and I am suspicious of any evidence that tries to paint PNAC as a Jewish plot. The kind of hate that fuels anti-Semitism is the very same kind of hate that presumably the truth movement finds reprehensible.
PNAC is such a bizarre bunch of losers, with such an utter lack of a sense of humor, that I sometimes think that their chances of succeeding in their plans are doomed just by the fact that the kind of idiots that are attracted to their cause (anyone who thinks it'd be fun to live in a bunker) tend to be assholes like Dick Cheyney who shoots his own Hunting Buddy by mistake. How are these guys, who probably don't know any good jokes and haven't had a good (HONEST) laugh in years and years, ever gonna convince the cops to declare martial law? Despite what Alex Jones might say, Police are not another species, they are people, and being an old-head I have had encounters with both good (cops who even even overlooked possession of weed in my younger days) and bad (in my opinion mean-spirited, and of course the corrupt cops you read about, though of course honest cops never get news stories written about them because honest cops are not a news story since they're supposed to be honest to begin with), and cops are not gonna turn en mass against the populace, and neither is the military, not any time soon. We are not in the same dire situation Germany was in when hitler was able to impose martial law so easily. The day could come! I am not saying the U.S. is immune from tyranny, but to compare our situation now with Germany's right when hitler took total power is not even close to a reasonable comparison, in my opinion.
But then I re-read sections of "Rebuilding America's Defences" and I realize that as ridiculous and out-of-touch-with-reality as these PNAC pinheads are, they are dangerous, and some are even able to attain positions of power, though let's face it, Dan Quail is a joke, Jeb Bush is a known election-fraud-gangster, Dick Cheyney has shot a guy with a shotgun, and George Bush has a very low approval rating. But if we allow computerized voting to be put in place it won't matter WHO we vote for, those with the most money and avarice could still gain control. So we got to keep our guard up.
But I am sure as hell not an anti-Semite. And I think that you should be real careful about trusting any info which tries to say PNAC is a Jewish plot, since the history of Humankind has been full of such libels and slanders which are horrible and unforgiveable excuses to persecute a group of people. Though I don't accuse you of anti-Semitism, since I regard such prejudices and hatreds as the putrid disease that causes all the ethnic cleansing that has and is going on.
Computerized voting scares me more than damn near anything.
nicolas - August 26, 2006 02:17 PM (GMT)
My suggestions:
When you start talking about WTC7, you could show a map of the area showing which tower is what. I get confused when I read about the Verizon tower, for example.
You could also try to go more slowly when talking about all that is known about the aircrafts that appeared, disappeared, loaded and unloaded passengers. Maybe it's just me, but I think it's way too fast. Maybe keeping a map in a corner of the screen, with dots showing were the different aircrafts were at what time would help. Also, it could be interesting to locate one of the planes that were supposedly destroyed but are in fact still flying... or did I misunderestand ?
Also, have you tried to interview Richard Wagner ? Not the composer (he's not a saudi terrorist, so he cannot be interviewed after his death), the guy from Convar. He's not american, how could the US government threaten him? (I know... one should never misunderestimate the president :P )