shouldnt a "skeptic" have information on why they feel as they do?

i think its very strange that the large amount of recent skeptics, are anything but skeptics....

they dont present a case.......they dont refer to the 9/11 commission, or anything eles supporting the official story....

they come in here, they all, act in the same manor...avoid, questions, atack, insult,
never seem the least bit interested, in the overwelming evidence....


is it possible to filter out the, enemy element? id like to chat with actual "skeptics" that actually find our information interesting.......aposed to not even reading it....avoiding it...attacking it...

you ask me....not all of them are civilians..

Hi THE DECIDER [salute]


I hope the below is a start...


Several filters have been put in place due to continued and excessive link SPAMMING !!!!!


i.e. topics were posted with

"check this great loose change review out"

and the link would go to one of the BUNK Gravy jobs...


The URL's are not misdirected (except for popular mechanics - now that one's just funny) they are slightly "munged" i.e "oo" becomes "00"

If they are desperate to post the link, they can post a note with it... i.e. change "9ll" to "911" to make it work...

I personally and many others are SICK of the same garbage URLs being sneakily slotted in attempt to grow their Google rank and link counts etc...

We have seen them ALL for many months and see no reason why they should be tolerated...

In my eyes they are worst than "f*ck"


Maybe we should forward them all the "seeloosechange.com" or "universalseed.org" - now that would be fun.


It is a simple exercise to remove the filters, if the majority of the regular "9/11 Truthers" want them removed and to allow for the continued SPAMMING of these links, then so be it.


All the best

LondonEye
[thumbsup]

Below are the current "Word Filters"




Added...

http://debunking9ll.com and http://www.debunking9ll.com

www.debunking911.com will still show, just not link


.

Thats exactly what they think of us too.

.... Remarkable.

it must be, you did make a remark, correct?

Gee, who would have thought the authorities would use the fear of spamming as an excuse to curtail basic civil liberties?

You know, maybe LondonEye spammed those links himself. It all adds up. Look at the anomalies! Operation Northwoods!! Inside Job!!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

wow Blinker...

Now that would be a twist and half to the story [whistle]


Maybe I'm also Gravy or the owner of the 911myths.com website :ph43r: and use my "true" knowledge of 9/11 to create those bunky sites :unsure:


We let this SPAMMING go on for long enough.... Other tactics included going into the "new members" welcome page and planting those CRAPPY and BOGUS links as "innocent" reviews etc and many other sly methods.

This forum is for 9/11 Truthers to converge, we allow those who believe in the official conspiracy theory to come and debate.

No official sources are filtered, maybe that's where the problem lies. A lot of the "critiques" are opinion based and rarely backed up with sources other than a link to these bogus debunks.

Bring the debate, not a one liner website which is cited as gospel... Don't be so lazy, do some independent research and bring that research, not parroting some shilly website, which is just as erroneous as the 9/11 Commission Report.


All the best

LondonEye
[thumbsup]

Speaking of the 9/11 Commision Report:

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...=ST&f=14&t=8946

I agree. Wading into any kind of discussion with a single line response and a link to a website/document/thread of significantly different scope to that particular discussion is unproductive, immature, or just plain stupid.

Good luck in stamping it out.

Oh, hey chuck. ;)