Title: Rate the Team Above You
MikeNY711 - December 16, 2007 05:13 AM (GMT)
Rate the team above you from 1-10 and say why.
Commish - December 16, 2007 06:10 AM (GMT)
7...Solid.... a .500 team....can't win the games it should and wins against who they probably wouldnt expect
LSU10893 - December 16, 2007 03:22 PM (GMT)
7....they are quality over .500 team
LBJ leading the way prob best player in the league
chipperboy1 - December 16, 2007 03:55 PM (GMT)
7. Solid team. Average team, as evidenced by their .500 record, but solid.
Ace$ - December 16, 2007 07:12 PM (GMT)
8.
One would expect a team with Tracy McGrady, Joe Johnson and Amare Stoudemire to be extremely dominant but thier record doesn't show it. In a central division where 6 out of the 8 teams are flashing 10 or more wins, the hawks shouldn't get too happy about the 12 wins they have right now. They are a team that can easily win 6, 7 games in a row, but turnovers are killing them and leaving the central wide open.
chipperboy1 - December 16, 2007 08:39 PM (GMT)
7. Solid team.
I'm not happy with 12 wins, but I figured out what the problem was.
bballer13333 - December 16, 2007 10:31 PM (GMT)
9.
Gerald Wallace is a weak link.
BraGz - December 16, 2007 10:39 PM (GMT)
Josh Cribbs' Owns - December 16, 2007 10:44 PM (GMT)
7.5, nice team. Needs a better SF.
bballer13333 - December 16, 2007 10:47 PM (GMT)
6.
Randolph the only true star. Overachieving a lot, but you will come back down to earth ;)
Commish - December 16, 2007 10:56 PM (GMT)
5....Great roster but barely even above .500
chipperboy1 - December 17, 2007 12:51 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Commish @ Dec 16 2007, 05:56 PM) |
| 5....Great roster but barely even above .500 |
8.5 if they keep LBJ, 6 if they trade him for all offers, 10 if they trade him for my offer. :D
yeahhhh welll - December 17, 2007 12:54 AM (GMT)
9.8
this team is very well set up for the future and right now. they are relatively young but they do lack an actual point guard. although JJ is doing a great job
Legitness - December 17, 2007 02:12 AM (GMT)
5... dnt agree w some of the trades the nets did
Ace$ - December 17, 2007 03:43 AM (GMT)
4 now but future looks great for quicknicks team.
monster - December 17, 2007 03:45 AM (GMT)
Legitness - December 17, 2007 03:49 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ace$ @ Dec 17 2007, 03:43 AM) |
| 4 now but future looks great for quicknicks team. |
that it does lol
chipperboy1 - December 17, 2007 06:50 AM (GMT)
Magic-9. Team looks a lot better now.
Bulls- 7. Solid team.
Kings- 4. Rebuilding efforts going well, though.
What do people think about this lineup now?
C: Amare Stoudamire
PF: Josh Smith
SF: T-Mac
SG: Joe Johnson
PG: Luke Ridnour
Ace$ - December 17, 2007 08:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chipperboy1 @ Dec 17 2007, 06:50 AM) |
Magic-9. Team looks a lot better now.
Bulls- 7. Solid team.
Kings- 4. Rebuilding efforts going well, though.
What do people think about this lineup now?
C: Amare Stoudamire
PF: Josh Smith
SF: T-Mac
SG: Joe Johnson
PG: Luke Ridnour |
Ridnour makes it look a ton better he's young but also more experienced than Jack, and can do it all.