Nate Robinson PG 23 5'9'' 180 C+ B B A- C C
Nate Robinson PG 23 5'9'' 180 B- or B B+ B A- C C

Alright, first going to start off by saying, Nate Robinson is an electrifying bench player and is a great scorer off the bench. Last year in 20 minutes per game he got 10 points per game, you double that and it is starter minutes which puts him at 20 points per game if he was starting games statistic wise, which deserves an upgrade at scoring. This year he gets 8 points per game in only 16 minutes, which is 16 in 32 minutes, which is also very good. Also, if his true potential is not at least a B it should be upped to B or A. He is still very young at 23 with lots of potential. He may be small but is very quick to the whole and can step back and hit a 3.

I have a bench player in Fred Jones who is B- B+ scoring, and I would say Robinson is better..

wow, and u want him to what? average 20 pts and 10 assists? lol

I said just dribbling, that doesn't raise your assist total high.. And I changed it back anyway. And if he gets 10 points per game in 20 minutes, that results in 20 in 40. :/

yeah lol id expect B- B+ scoring maybe for 15 ppg, and like 8.75 apg if he started

How would get 8 assists per game with B handles? :/

Nah see the problem is, just because a player averages, say 8 and 5 in 14 minutes doesn't mean they'll average 16 and 10 in 28 minutes. Just doesn't happen, their stats flatline.

Why wouldn't he? And there is no way with his ratings that he'll average his normal stats or even come close and don't we want this league to be realistic? He has those kind of skills. Getting 8-10 points in 20 minutes is pretty good.

they arent going to double im sure

he doesnt deserve those stats at all

Any reasons? I don't see anyone putting up a compelling argument why he shouldn't. He comes off the bench, brings a nice scoring spark and can't do it with the original ratings.

DENIED....HIS POTENTIAL WILL TAKE CARE OF THIS