Title: Fourth Beverly Hills Cop Planned
Riverwide - May 29, 2008 12:29 PM (GMT)
Fourth Beverly Hills Cop Planned
Eddie Murphy's back, Ratner to direct
Rocky. Rambo. Die Hard. Indiana Jones. Wait, there's one '80s action franchise that hasn't recently had a fourth instalment! What about Beverly Hills Cop? Is it racism? We were going to write an article called 80s Action Franchises Are Sitting On Top Of The World, but now we might as well call it 80s Action Franchises Can Sit On Top Of The World Just As Long As They Don't Star A Black Man, Cause...* Oh, wait. They've just announced a Beverly Hills Cop IV, with Eddie Murphy set to return as Axel Foley. Er. Carry on.
Yes, Murphy is back in the role that transformed him from comedy hit to megastar and allowed his entourage to swell from zero to 107 (probably). He pitched the project to Paramount, who leapt aboard the idea, having recently worked with Murphy on the upcoming Nowhereland.
The studio talked to a number of directors before choosing Brett Ratner for the job, presumably having realised that the Rush Hour films are wannabe BHCs anyway, and that this sort of material should play very close to Ratner's strengths.
There's no writer or plot as yet, but we're going to go ahead and guess that Axel Foley (Murphy) will find himself investigating a murder in which he has a personal stake in Beverly Hills. Fast-talking and much culture-clash will follow if you ask us. I know, we're crazy that way.
Lorenzo di Bonaventura will produce, with original producer Jerry Bruckheimer apparently not involved. Expect some explosions anyway; just maybe not as many.
So, does this bring a sense of completion to your 80s nostalgia? Is there anyone else you'd like to see return? And will Ratner do it justice?
*For the uninitiated / forgetful, this is a riff on Foley's efforts to scam his way in to the Beverly Palm Hotel in the first film.
Source: Variety
LeToya Abdul - May 29, 2008 08:45 PM (GMT)
Ugh...WHY? :manson: It was good while it lasted, but NO MORE PLEASE
Glamorama - May 30, 2008 01:30 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LeToya Abdul @ May 29 2008, 09:45 PM) |
| Ugh...WHY? :manson: It was good while it lasted, but NO MORE PLEASE |
The 1st one was watchable.
The others SUCKED. And when I say SUCKED i mean in the manner that Eddie Murphy sucked off the tranny whores he's so fond of.
bulletproof_heart - May 30, 2008 02:24 PM (GMT)
Eddie must need the money
MANK
Fembot 1 - May 30, 2008 03:48 PM (GMT)
UGH! I fucking hate those movies! :manson:
Riverwide - May 30, 2008 03:51 PM (GMT)
I'm quite nostalgic about a lot of 80s movies, especially comedies, but not this one. I was never into them at all.
Fembot 1 - May 30, 2008 05:08 PM (GMT)
Eddie Murphy has all the charm of a recently deposited turd. :angry:
TickTock - May 31, 2008 12:08 AM (GMT)
I think the next idiot who plans to revive a stale franchise from the early 80s, should be shot, or at the very least put on death row!
nothingfails - June 7, 2008 07:19 PM (GMT)
I am surprised a pt. 4 is greenlighted after the dried up turd the third one was. The first two were good though