I was looking round youtube and I saw this Sonic the Hedgehog 2 and 3 Review and falt ok I look that it. and after it I was like WTF. tell me what you think

P.S: I didn't know what topic this should go under ?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=N6ny6fnNxKM

And they're professional game critics? I don't think so. They don't mention any good points to the game, and practically every sentence they are just calling the game nothing but dog do do. The have no proof to back up their comments. And the review is not on the game but on things that have nothing to do with the game. Tails is even more stupid in Sonic 3? That was completely biased. In a matter of fact that wasn't even a review it was really just bashing the game with "their" opinions on it.

This is exactly what it is. THEIR opinions on it. You guys probably think "OMFG ITS THE AWESOMEST GAM IN TEH WLROD ANBYODY WH DOSNT THIKN SO IS BIASED AND BASHING IT."

They are giving their opinions, which is obviously that the game is crap. You guys seem more biased.

EDIT: Remove post please.

We don't think it, we know it.

I look that the others video the two made they not that good most of the time too

Did you even WATCH their reviews of the Sonic games? These clowns don't know what they're talking about! Not to mention, they just seem to be inventing excuses to complain about a classic that modern games are built on.

Starting with Sonic 1:

No save functionality. We'll start there. First of all, these two jokers have made it clear with that one statement that they've never played older games like Super Mario Bros. And I doubt they'd like it if they did. They wouldn't be able to handle it.

And half the time they don't even know what they're talking about.

Mario 3 had save functionality? That's news to me. I own the game for NES, and believe me, you had to start from square one every time you turned the NES on. Sure, you could continue (you can continue in Sonic too) but you lose your progress if you reset.

Too hard? Have these two ever heard of something called a challenge? These guys aren't just clowns, they're morons. And they're not gamers if they have to complain about a game being too hard.

The music is bad? Gee, what music is considered GOOD to these two? I bet they thought the Dub theme song for Pokemon Diamond/Pearl was an epic masterpiece. I imagine that these two don't really have much taste in music.

And for all the bashing and the stuff about saying the game was horrible, they sure changed their tune by the end of the review, actually saying it's worth the download. How can I respect the opinion of people who don't even know what their opinion is, let alone what they're talking about?

Oh, oh. It's baaad. But... but, you might like it if you were born in that era and it's worth a download and blah blah blah! Gee, do these two even know what they're talking about? No, they don't. I don't need to ask that question.


Alright. Moving onto Sonic 2:

A little bit better than Sonic 1. Now, remember that they ended their review of Sonic 1 with 'it's worth a download', after all the negative stuff they pulled out of the air about it. Remember that when you read the rest of this.

Terrible? The first one was terrible, so this one's terrible? Um, what? Didn't you just say that the first one was worth a download? Did I miss something here, or did the space-time continuum reverse itself in the last 2 minutes? Because I could've sworn you just said that Sonic 1 was worth downloading.

I'll forego any comments about Tails himself, because I'll sound biased. But there is one thing I have to mention.

They call Sonic 2 a single player game, when it obviously isn't. It was clear that Sega was going for multiplayer aspects when they made Tails usable with a second controller, and the whole versus race. So that renders their argument useless.

Problems with the camera? This is more proof that these two have never played any 8-bit or 16-bit games. Back then, the camera was fixed. It didn't move or rotate. So how in the name of all logic could there possibly be problems with the camera if it's fixed? Do the laws of physics cease to exist in their mother's basement? Do they have a magic Wii?

As it is, the worst thing about Sonic back then was the tendancy to outrun the screen. But it corrects itself almost immediately when it happens, so it isn't an issue. And since Tails is immortal in the main game, why would anyone playing as him even be concerned about the camera?

Once again, the music. You can see the first part for that.

Level design's been done before? Do I really need to go on here?


Classics that games are built on, have 'issues' like difficulty, lack of save functionality, and 2-player options. They have these issues because they're challenging? Is this a joke?

And I'm not saying anything about their Sonic 3 review. It'll just make you guys cry.

These two aren't gamers, and this is a croc. That's all I have to say.


Oh my God, this is old. Sorry about that. I just noticed.

Yeah reviewers pick on sonic constantly, but to say his ORIGINAL games suck is going WAY TO FAR.
Their graphics are AMAZING they'd been doing things never done before, when mario's game came out sure it was fine, but it lacked the ability to speed through levels, and it is a fact their graphics were better.
as for what game is better that is opinion.

but to say music and all that suck? pft that's just an armature rating, it shows they're not true hearted gamers not to bash but man, how can you say those games sucked when they revolutionized video gaming? that along with the zelda games were the best of their time, and mario i guess was good if you prefer those types of games. I'm not biased against mario but i didn't find his game all that fun, but that's probably because I'm impatient. lol

Those two speak nonsense... just read their comments. Personally I prefer sonic (1-3 & Knux) than Mario plataformers (though Super Mario World and Mario World 3 are still awesome) all though, Tails is kinda useless in sonic 2 IMO... unless you play in multiplayer.

Not Terrible.

Do these idots know what they are talking about? They say it sucks at first, then they say it´s pretty good. Wth? :blink: