Title: Backaround Fall
Toast - July 4, 2006 07:43 PM (GMT)
k i dont get backaround fall
its bak 12-12 then pass 12-23 then bak 23-23 etc right?
or is it bak 12-23,then 23-34
then 34-....45?
like the pinkybak? wtf?
k thanks
Eriror - July 4, 2006 07:55 PM (GMT)
After the RingBak, the pen should be in the right position for the PinkyBak. I'll upload a video when you ask for it. :)
FooK - July 4, 2006 08:09 PM (GMT)
if u know the finger basics like 1 = indexfinger etc ill explain this as good as i can.
the middle number of the breakdown is always the finger that is on top of the pen, so if i say like this, 123 > midbak then its the middlefinger on the pen, ring and index under.
ok listen up, this is how bakfall works:
Bak > pass 123 > midbak > pass 123-234(ringfinger is above the pen, holding it) > ringbak > pass 234-34 (now the pen is hold only had 34, so it got catched at 234 again, and then went as a pass so it only was holded by 34, then u can simply do an pinkyaround) > pinkyaround.
Bak > pass 123 > midbak > pass 123-234 > ringbak > pass 234-34 > pinkyaround.
i hope i cleared this for u.
Eriror - July 4, 2006 08:14 PM (GMT)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvDYCgE2Nk8Hm... Done, haha.. Hey FooK, I got it on the first try! ;)
romainhxc - July 5, 2006 12:19 AM (GMT)
ill would say try to keep your finger relaxed and focus on the motion of the hand
xz64 - July 5, 2006 01:00 AM (GMT)
By any chance would this be a Korean backaround fall? The first two baks always look Korean.
Madlogic - July 5, 2006 01:05 AM (GMT)
Err, I don't understand what a "Pass 123" is. Is this the same as a Fingerpass? I thought those were written as "Fingerpass 34-23" and such?
I'm lost :(.
tokuwee15 - July 5, 2006 01:42 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (FooK) |
Bak > pass 123 > midbak > pass 123-234 > ringbak > pass 234-34 > pinkyaround.
|
it's pinkybak. not pinkyaround. yes, there's a difference.
| QUOTE (Toast14) |
| neobak fall has fl passes...no? |
yes. so does bak fall.
| QUOTE (Madlogic) |
| Err, I don't understand what a "Pass 123" is. |
pass 123 = pass 12-23
| QUOTE (Madlogic) |
| I thought those were written as "Fingerpass 34-23" and such? |
they are...pass 123 is just an older way.
| QUOTE (xz64) |
| By any chance would this be a Korean backaround fall? |
if you're talking about Eriror's, then yes.
ChucKo - July 5, 2006 02:41 AM (GMT)
they greatly resemble reverse indexaround and such. why call it backaround when it seems to be more like a reverse around?
-Ko
tokuwee15 - July 5, 2006 03:49 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (demo) |
| how does bak 12-23 work? |
you do a bak from 12, instead of catching at T1, let it slip under the index and middle fingers and catch at 23. but bak 12-23 is not used in either the neobak fall nor the bak fall.
| QUOTE (Toast14) |
so can someone who can do but make a video of them doing neobak fall, then bak fall?
|
well...i don't have a camera, but sunrise does both of them at his site -
http://www4.pf-x.net/~sunrise/pen/^just click on the link that says "backaround combo" around the bottom of the page.
the first thing he does is almost a neobak fall, except he does a bak at the end (it's supposed to be a neobak caught at 34). the second is the bak fall.
romainhxc - July 5, 2006 10:42 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ChucKo @ Jul 5 2006, 02:41 AM) |
they greatly resemble reverse indexaround and such. why call it backaround when it seems to be more like a reverse around? -Ko |
at least someone who thinks like me :) .whe had a debate on ucpsb, and i was one of the few (logical) people who noticed that these look more like around than baks.
i ve always fought this combo should be called "around fall" and not bakfall
sketching - July 5, 2006 04:07 PM (GMT)
I always thought of Backaround Fall to be like what David Weis (I think) had talked about before:
Backaround 12 (go through the T1 slot straight into 23) >
Backaround 23 (go through the T1 slot straight into 34) >
Backaround 34 (caught in the T1 slot)
romainhxc - July 5, 2006 04:21 PM (GMT)
in david weis definition a backaround must pass over the index to be a real backaround, so i think what we call mid back(for example) couldn't really be considered as backaround since it doesn't pass over the index...
but seems nobody doesn't think like that anymore
Leviathan - July 5, 2006 08:43 PM (GMT)
Names change as time goes on and more tricks are discovered.
Imagine if our thumbs weren't opposable (opposite of the other 4 fingers), a regular bak would look just like a middlebak. But they don't look the same because of the placement of the thumb. So, a middlebak is a real backaround, ir just doesn't look the same.
Around fall is indexaround > pass rev 12-23 > middlearound > pass rev 23-34 > ringaround
Here's a video of some reverse arounds and baks (korean).
http://www.zippyvideos.com/2043558745527236/arounds_baks/There's a difference between a reverse around and a bak. A reverse around is more vertical, and a bak is fingerless and more horizontal.
Alucard - July 10, 2006 08:40 PM (GMT)
ive many problems with this trick hier are some
trys can someone help me ??
UnEmploymentDude - July 10, 2006 09:24 PM (GMT)
I got stuck at the ring finger too. I was thinking about doing a Korean bakaround, but would that still qualify as a back around fall?
Ivan the Terrible - July 23, 2006 08:52 PM (GMT)
I would post a vid of my backaround fall but my face is visible so i won't.
And practice makes perfect.
Edit: made an other vid
http://www.zippyvideos.com/1785792535657576/bak_fall/
T_N_C - November 14, 2006 01:56 AM (GMT)
is this call bakfall or what ?
If this is bakfall , i will partice on it, if wrong please show me right bakfall , slowly plz :help:
Youtube
Eso - November 14, 2006 05:00 AM (GMT)
Yes, that's a Bakfall, although it's a slow one. If you are able to make it more smooth, then yeah, it'd be awesome.
Sfsr - November 14, 2006 09:55 AM (GMT)
BakFall = Rev. IA -> Rev. MA -> Rev. RA -> Rev. PA?
Gaah, I thought it only was to Rev. RA D: Now I have to practise even more >.>
Mats - November 14, 2006 10:47 AM (GMT)
A true bak fall would be Bak > MiddleBak > RingBak > PinkyBak.
Most people don't do proper BackArounds in it though, so very few can do a true BackAround fall.
tohxinzhan29 - November 14, 2006 11:19 AM (GMT)
I just can't do my ringbak well and i cannot link the bak with the middle bak easily. "sigh" I'll have to keep practicing.
Dongza5047 - November 14, 2006 11:41 AM (GMT)
Yes it's Bak fall
but hard to practice ring bak
:angry:
Aldmer - November 14, 2006 07:07 PM (GMT)
I learnt Backfall in really few time by training: Rev MA > Rev RA. Only practice this... and then you'll get it :D
nike t - November 14, 2006 09:48 PM (GMT)
but they aren't arounds, they're baks, that's why it's called bakfall, not around fall
chanman123 - November 14, 2006 11:53 PM (GMT)
the ones you probably find most attractive and that is used most are the korean backarounds.
I think XZ does his with the Weissan ones.
xz64 - November 15, 2006 12:19 AM (GMT)
when it comes to the baks after the first one, they don't end up truly weissan
but what made you think i do my bakfalls weissan anyways?
The King - November 15, 2006 03:15 AM (GMT)
My midback goes just below middle knuckle of finger. Is this considered a true bak?
yxTay - November 15, 2006 03:33 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (T_N_C @ Nov 14 2006, 09:56 AM) |
is this call bakfall or what ? If this is bakfall , i will partice on it, if wrong please show me right bakfall , slowly plz :help: Youtube |
No, that isn't the BackAround Fall. It more closely resembles the NeoBackAround Fall that the BackAround Fall.
What you did is (questionably): NeoBackAround Normal 12-123 > NeoBackAround Normal 23-234 > NeoBackAround Normal 34-34 > PinkBackAround Normal 34-34
The BackAround Fall is: BackAround Normal 12-T12 > Pass Normal 12-23 > MiddleBackAround Normal 23-123 > Pass Normal 23-34 > RingBackAround Normal 34-234 > PinkyBackAround Normal 34-34
The NeoBackAround Fall is: NeoBackAround Normal 12-123 > NeoBackAround Normal 23-234 > NeoBackAround Normal 34-34
So what you did is NeoBackAround Fall > PinkyBackAround Normal 34-34.
Eriror - November 15, 2006 06:02 PM (GMT)
spinofdoom - November 15, 2006 06:07 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (yxTay @ Nov 15 2006, 11:33 AM) |
| QUOTE (T_N_C @ Nov 14 2006, 09:56 AM) | is this call bakfall or what ? If this is bakfall , i will partice on it, if wrong please show me right bakfall , slowly plz :help: Youtube |
No, that isn't the BackAround Fall. It more closely resembles the NeoBackAround Fall that the BackAround Fall.
What you did is (questionably): NeoBackAround Normal 12-123 > NeoBackAround Normal 23-234 > NeoBackAround Normal 34-34 > PinkBackAround Normal 34-34
The BackAround Fall is: BackAround Normal 12-T12 > Pass Normal 12-23 > MiddleBackAround Normal 23-123 > Pass Normal 23-34 > RingBackAround Normal 34-234 > PinkyBackAround Normal 34-34
The NeoBackAround Fall is: NeoBackAround Normal 12-123 > NeoBackAround Normal 23-234 > NeoBackAround Normal 34-34
So what you did is NeoBackAround Fall > PinkyBackAround Normal 34-34.
|
Uhh so wasn't it a hybrid?
Mats - November 15, 2006 06:10 PM (GMT)
Umm.
I always though BackAround Fall was just BackAround > MiddleBackAround > RingBackAround > PinkyBackAround. I don't see the need for any passes.
And, Korean BackAround is just a Fingerless IndexAround Reverse. Korean Bak fall would be a Fingerless Around Reverse fall for me.
Weis states clearly in his description of a BackAround that it will go around the knuckle. If it doesn't go around the knuckly, it isn't a BackAround, it's a Fingerless Around Reverse, since all the pen is doing is going around the finger, not a part of the hand.
The King - November 15, 2006 06:24 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Mats @ Nov 16 2006, 06:10 AM) |
Umm.
I always though BackAround Fall was just BackAround > MiddleBackAround > RingBackAround > PinkyBackAround. I don't see the need for any passes. |
Thats actually impossible if you were to try.
Mats - November 15, 2006 06:27 PM (GMT)
Which part would be impossible?
LittleRaisin - November 15, 2006 06:36 PM (GMT)
It's not impossible. I don't think you need to use passes.
The King - November 15, 2006 06:38 PM (GMT)
The passes aren't really passes its more like adjusting the cog.
tokuwee15 - November 16, 2006 03:06 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (The King @ Nov 15 2006, 01:24 PM) |
| QUOTE (Mats @ Nov 16 2006, 06:10 AM) | Umm.
I always though BackAround Fall was just BackAround > MiddleBackAround > RingBackAround > PinkyBackAround. I don't see the need for any passes. |
Thats actually impossible if you were to try.
|
It's not impossible..it's just mad hard. :thumb:
IMO, that would be equivalent (in difficulty) to Cont. Ringbak X4. :banana:
The way everyone does it uses passes. So. ..it would be like..
bak 12-12 -> pass 12-23 -> middlebak 123-23 -> pass 23-34 -> ringbak 234-34 -> pinkybak 34-34.
| QUOTE (The King) |
| The passes aren't really passes its more like adjusting the cog. |
They're passes.
T_N_C - November 16, 2006 01:28 PM (GMT)
BackAround Fall(Korean Style)Use vietnamese : phù mệt quá !!!!
yxTay - November 16, 2006 02:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Mats @ Nov 16 2006, 02:10 AM) |
| I always though BackAround Fall was just BackAround > MiddleBackAround > RingBackAround > PinkyBackAround. I don't see the need for any passes. |
So BackAround Fall would be like: BackAround Normal 12-T23 > MiddleBackAround Normal 23-134 > RingBackAround Normal 34-234 > PinkyBackAround Normal 34-34? That's what I thought so initially. But I wasn't the first one to give the name BackAround Fall, so I guess I have no control over it.
Interfector155 - November 16, 2006 02:43 PM (GMT)
Logically, that probably should be how the combo is performed (Bak>MBak>RBak>PBak, no passes).
Also, from a technical standpoint, should a falling/rising combo contain tricks other than the one doing the fall/rise (in this case, should the pass be included in the bak fall)? In my opinion, no. But that's not up to me :lol:. Anyway, it's no biggie, just my 2 cents.