Title: neobak variations
Description: reverse/inverse
Bobr - November 21, 2006 03:03 PM (GMT)
Can someone give me tutorial or video (only download link plz i have problem with videos) for inverse neobak, reverse neobak or maybe inverse reverse neobak?
yxTay - November 22, 2006 01:42 AM (GMT)
It might be more correct to refer to the trick as the Fingerless Shadow than the NeoBackAround, since according to current definitions, the NeoBackAround involves the pen spinning strictly on the back of hand, whereas the Shadow involves the pen spinning on the plane created by the fingers.
crazymonkeyz - November 22, 2006 07:40 AM (GMT)
Where did you hear the name neoback around???
The King - November 22, 2006 07:49 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (crazymonkeyz @ Nov 22 2006, 07:40 PM) |
| Where did you hear the name neoback around??? |
neobackaround is the proper name,but every just uses neoback.
rorixbladewing5 - November 22, 2006 08:52 AM (GMT)
Actually, according to the naming committee, the proper abbrieviation is NeoBak :rolleyes:
sketching - November 22, 2006 03:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (rorixbladewing5 @ Nov 22 2006, 01:52 AM) |
| Actually, according to the naming committee, the proper abbrieviation is NeoBak :rolleyes: |
Actually, it's "Neobak" ;)
Neobackaround came into existence soon after Backaround.
yxTay - November 23, 2006 04:26 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sketching @ Nov 22 2006, 11:46 PM) |
| QUOTE (rorixbladewing5 @ Nov 22 2006, 01:52 AM) | | Actually, according to the naming committee, the proper abbrieviation is NeoBak :rolleyes: |
Actually, it's "Neobak" ;) |
I'd say NeoBak instead.
Everyone's off topic. Anyone can help Bobr?
sketching - November 23, 2006 04:43 AM (GMT)
tohxinzhan29 - November 23, 2006 04:48 AM (GMT)
Man, this suxs, I can't get it to work for nuts.
yxTay - November 23, 2006 05:41 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (tohxinzhan29 @ Nov 23 2006, 12:48 PM) |
| Man, this suxs, I can't get it to work for nuts. |
Cry about it, but you don't have to post that here.
ed sect mobile - November 23, 2006 05:47 AM (GMT)
that video is really low quality and it is really hard to see what is going on just incase you didn't notice. :rolleyes:
Bobr - November 25, 2006 01:52 PM (GMT)
I see charge 12 > inverse shadow still normal 12-12.
Flip - November 27, 2006 04:02 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Bobr @ Nov 25 2006, 08:52 AM) |
|
I see charge 12 > inverse shadow still normal 12-12.
|
He is left handed...
Here is a clearer example (inverse neobak -> tw sonic rev):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7NsUcJ9a2UI myself find inverse reverse neobaks much easier. (I can do them 34-34, 23-23, and 12-12. I'm also working on a combo involving those three, that i hope to have soon)
Bobr - November 27, 2006 06:49 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flip @ Nov 27 2006, 03:02 PM) |
| QUOTE (Bobr @ Nov 25 2006, 08:52 AM) | |
I see charge 12 > inverse shadow still normal 12-12.
|
He is left handed... Here is a clearer example (inverse neobak -> tw sonic rev): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7NsUcJ9a2UI myself find inverse reverse neobaks much easier. (I can do them 34-34, 23-23, and 12-12. I'm also working on a combo involving those three, that i hope to have soon) |
can u create download link, i can't see videos from youtube