View Full Version: 6 Hr Ban

UCPSB :: the Collective Pen Spinning Board > Comments > 6 Hr Ban



Title: 6 Hr Ban


firebird - January 24, 2007 09:01 PM (GMT)
Stupid polls occur when people make multi-choice polls when they should actually be single choice.

neXus - January 24, 2007 09:26 PM (GMT)
Too light.

Interfector155 - January 24, 2007 09:47 PM (GMT)
Should increase with each offence. Making the multi-choice polls now, with the little warning message Zombo was talking about, is complete and utter stupidity. It pretty much says "Are you sure you want to be a moron?" There's absolutely no excuse for clicking yes (unless, of course, it's a situation where multi-choice is the appropriate type, but there's not many situations that it would be). So give'em 6 hours to sit and think about how stupid they are, for the first offence, at least.

Second offence should be permanent ban. Ok, maybe more like a 24-hour ban, but, c'mon. WhyTF would you make the same mistake twice, even after a second warning message???

LOL, I apologize for being a jackass, but there really is no excuse for stupidity. :lol:

Dr1v37h38u5 - January 24, 2007 09:54 PM (GMT)
this punishment needs to have at least one warning before it goes into affect.

wouldn't a noob be driven away from the forum if they unknowingly make a multi-choice poll and suddenly they're banned? if that happened to me, i would definitly be afraid of this forum.

TurbulentTurtle - January 24, 2007 10:44 PM (GMT)
IMO, a 6 hour ban is kinda light for any offense, even one as minor as a stupid poll. It should at least be a couple days, since a couple hours doesn't really mean too much.

heyimon1294 - January 24, 2007 10:55 PM (GMT)
oh snap, better watch my polls :lol:
i think tht it should increase because there really is no excuse for being stupid and ignoring a warning/ban

NF Alex - January 24, 2007 11:38 PM (GMT)
Doesn't matter in the spammer's bin, right? :rolleyes:

Zombo - January 25, 2007 12:51 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (NF Alex @ Jan 24 2007, 07:38 PM)
Doesn't matter in the spammer's bin, right?  :rolleyes:

no it does. what's the point of making a multiple choice poll that's supposed to be single choice, even if off-topic?

Interfector155 - January 25, 2007 02:46 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dr1v37h38u5 @ Jan 24 2007, 04:54 PM)
this punishment needs to have at least one warning before it goes into affect.

wouldn't a noob be driven away from the forum if they unknowingly make a multi-choice poll and suddenly they're banned? if that happened to me, i would definitly be afraid of this forum.

Well, the warning is the window that pops up that Zombo posted about so... if someone ignores that and posts the multi-choice poll anyway, then yeah, there needs to be punishment.

kensai - January 25, 2007 03:17 PM (GMT)
I've committed this mistake a couple of times lol...not because I was 'stupid', but because by habit I used the multi-poll option. That's why I chose the last option - makes people remember if you increase the ban each time. Also, it solves the problem of determining what is 'too heavy' or 'too light'.

ed sect mobile - January 31, 2007 05:29 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (NF Alex @ Jan 24 2007, 11:38 PM)
Doesn't matter in the spammer's bin, right?

No rules apply in the spammer's bin.
I voted for Too light a little while ago, but after reading kensai's post what he said makes a lot of sense and I think that is the system that should be applied.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree