Anybody done this before...? Hold the pen between the index fingers of both your hands & do charge... i can do rev charge 11 this way

Will it be useful for a combo?

wow i didnt think that was possible. its like one of those rare tricks.
i dont really understand ur explanation. did u think of this, or have you seen it before?

I was thinking of it. I want to come up with a way to make a hand transfer out of it, o r just do it for fun. I've also been working on a 2 handed fingerpass combo (like an extended fp)

i tried to do charge with both hand together on 1 pen, but not very well... seems a bit weird. maybe just the wrong way.

I can only get one rotation doing this. Rather uncomfortable.

How do you know which is Rev/Normal. A Charge Normal is a Charge Rev in the other hand, and if it's in both hands?

u use the same concept as you would with the charges you do with t1
i think? would that make sense?

And what concept would that be?

The same concept that you use for any other pair of fingers. :lol:
@Tainted Elements: that won't work. You rotate the pen in different directions depening on which hand you use. Using one finger from each hand means you would technically have to rotate the pen in two different directions at once.

well the way i do it. (if i could) wouldnt we just refer it to be:
forward rotation = normal backward rotation = reverse

That doesn't really help, what exactly do you mean by forward/backward rotation?

if the pen was turning away form your chin = forward
pen rotating towards from your chin = backward

That won't work.
If you have the pen positioned directly in front of your chin, either way will move the pen away from your chin. The first half rotation will move it away, the second half will bring it back. You have to have the pen on either one side or the other to be able to make the pen spin towards the chin, which would not work on camera. You would have to rely on the pen-to-viewer relationship shown to determine a normal/reverse direction, which doesn't make sense.

this whole trick kind of doesnt make complete sense to me, unless theirs an approriate video to back-up the motion of the trick.

Unfortunately I broke my camera. After some thought, the method I do could be considered neither charge normal nor charge reverse because the rotation of charge reverse in the right hand is the rotation of charge normal in the left hand, & when held by both hands, it doesn't matter. Thus from now on I think I will name it depending on which finger is the operating finger (one remains stationary, one turns). If the left hand operates, it will be named according to left hand conventions, & visa versa.

how about tell which way its spinning? ex clockwise, counterclockwise.

i think it would be unnecisarilly complicated to try and do it with hands (like what if you did a double charge left hand 12 > both hands 11?

wont work. someone looking at you on the left side, will be clockwise.
some one lloking at you on your right side, will be counterclockwise.

It doesn't matter. You could name it based on the hand it started from, or from the hand whose finger is on bottom, whatever. That was just my proposal